Welcome back, name
Benest & Syvret Website Build
All strategic work is complete and the visual concept has been signed off. The full suite of design templates is now ready for your review in Figma. Once you sign off the templates, we move into the Webflow development phase and target a soft launch.
Project Progress
Actions Required by you
Sign off full design template suite to begin development
All page templates have been designed in Figma — homepage, service pages, team, case studies, about, and contact. Please review the complete design suite and confirm you're happy for us to move into the Webflow development phase.
Once signed off, we'll begin the build and target a soft launch. Two rounds of consolidated feedback are included during the build review — please gather all comments internally before submitting each round.
Meetings
What we discussed
Concept presented: Tom presented the visual direction and mock-up for the Benest & Syvret site. Initial reaction from Philip and Morag was strong — described as slick, professional, and crisp.
Journey naming: "The Clarity Path" (the five-stage client process framework) was reviewed. Philip felt the name didn't fit the firm's tone — "suits a Buddhist monastery" — and preferred something more grounded in the firm's trusted-advisor, cradle-to-grave positioning. Journey-based alternatives discussed, with "The Benest & Syvret Journey" emerging as the preferred direction.
Site structure adjustments: Employment law to move to Business only, removed from Personal and Litigation to avoid confusion. Team photos confirmed per service line with a maximum of four people shown per page.
Testimonials: Discussed whether to attribute or keep anonymous. Agreed anonymous is the right call — easier to manage approvals, and expected from a firm operating at this level.
Promotional banner: Request to add a toggleable banner per page for time-sensitive notices — promotions, law changes, or urgent contact details.
Insights section: Hannah is building out articles. Agreed a branded fallback image will cover any gaps while content is being produced.
Google reviews: Philip open to encouraging existing clients to leave Google reviews. Tom to provide a direct deep link so staff can include it in matter-closure emails as a standard sign-off.
What we agreed
Design direction: First impression reaction was positive — "feels slick, looks professional, crisp." Direction confirmed subject to weekend review.
Journey naming: "The Clarity Path" to be revised — Philip felt it "suits a Buddhist monastery". Preferred direction is journey-based framing (e.g. "The Benefit Journey") consistent with the cradle-to-grave, trusted-advisor positioning. Tom to update all documents.
Employment law: Move to Business section only — remove from Personal and Litigation.
Team photos: Per service line, max four people per page. Property: Philip, Robin, Wendy, and one other. Employment: Claire Kingham only, triaging to others. Family and Litigation: near-equivalent small teams.
Testimonials: Keep anonymous — easier to manage and expected from a law firm.
Promotional banner: Toggle on/off per page for promotions, law changes, and urgent contact notices.
Insights: Hannah building out articles. Branded fallback image to cover gaps in the interim.
Contact form: To fire an email noting which service page the enquiry originated from.
Google reviews: Philip happy to ask existing clients. Tom to supply a deep link opening the Google review form directly. Suggested approach: standard staff wording sent as an email sign-off after a successful matter closes.
Next steps
Philip / Morag: Review the mock-up over the weekend and confirm direction early next week
Philip: Share designs with Greg and Claire for sign-off
Tom: Begin designing remaining pages once confirmed — approximately two weeks to completion
Tom: Update "The Clarity Path" to revised journey name in the document
Tom: Send Google review deep link that opens the review form directly
What we discussed
- Positioning — Benest & Syvret's clear differentiation is built around three things: purpose before profit, outcome-led advice (particularly in litigation), and a genuinely personal, accessible service that larger or more corporate firms simply can't replicate. The phrase "if you had the expertise we did, what would you do?" captures the philosophy well — honest guidance, not billable hours for their own sake.
- Ideal client — someone who values a long-term relationship over a quick transaction, wants to be told the truth even when it's uncomfortable, and finds comfort in knowing the same team knows their history. Two peak seasons identified: post-Christmas/New Year and July–August.
- Core fears — uncertainty about process, anxiety over spiralling costs, and the frustration of repeating their story to different people. The "black hole" of poor communication was a recurring theme — clients not knowing what's happening or why.
- Value delivered — same-day phone response, speaking directly to the person doing the work, transparent and genuinely fixed fees with itemised breakdowns, a welcoming and calm environment, and adaptability (you'll come to the client if needed). The multi-generational client relationships are powerful proof of trust built over time.
- Signature process — enquiry → rough costing call within hours → meeting with the actual fee-earner → client care letter → clear engagement with transparent billing → regular communication throughout → closure letter and full document pack. No charging for multiple people reading the same email. No hidden success fees. Fixed price means fixed price.
- Common client mistakes — using AI for legal advice, taking action before seeking counsel (and compromising their position), listening to friends rather than professionals, and waiting too long when problems escalate.
What we agreed
- Positioning anchors: purpose before profit, honest advice, transparent billing, personal continuity, and adaptability.
- Tone of voice: warm, calm, direct. Not corporate. Not jargon-heavy. "We'll be the bad guy so you don't have to."
- First-step process to be prominently featured — rough costing call as the low-friction entry point.
- Separate first-time buyer journey to be scoped into the sitemap.
- Sitemap and first draft demand tension map to be with you next week.
Next steps
- Tom: Produce sitemap showing page hierarchy and structure — with you by end of next week.
- Tom: Produce first draft demand tension map based on today's session — with you by end of next week.
- Morag / team: Send over any existing photography assets you may have as that'll be key for brand feel.